Aaditya Thackeray Named in Disha Salian Case: CBI Registers FIR to Probe Gang Rape, Murder & Cover-Up Charges

Aaditya Thackeray is named in the Disha Salian case FIR as CBI begins a fresh probe into allegations surrounding her 2020 death.

The Aaditya Thackeray and Disha Salian case has returned to the spotlight after the CBI registered an FIR following a Bombay High Court order. The fresh probe will examine allegations including gang rape, murder, conspiracy and an alleged cover-up. Several names have been mentioned in the complaint, but being named in an FIR does not establish guilt. The CBI will now investigate the allegations and determine whether evidence supports the claims.

Also Read- Hyundai Bayon SUV India Launch Date: Expected Diwali Launch, Price, Engine, CNG & Features

Aaditya Thackeray Named in Disha Salian Case as CBI Registers FIR: What the Fresh Probe Will Examine

The Disha Salian case has once again come into focus after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered an FIR into the circumstances surrounding the 2020 death of the former celebrity manager. The development comes after the Bombay High Court directed the agency to carry out a fresh investigation based on a petition filed by Disha’s father, Satish Salian.

The case has attracted renewed attention because the FIR refers to allegations including gang rape, murder, criminal conspiracy and an alleged cover-up. Aaditya Thackeray is among the names mentioned in the complaint/FIR, along with several other public figures and former police officials.

However, it is important to understand that being named in an FIR or complaint does not automatically mean that a person has been declared an accused or found guilty. The Bombay High Court specifically directed that nobody should be treated as an accused unless the investigating officer finds sufficient material creating reasonable suspicion.

Also Read- Who Is Asha Sharma? Meet the Indian-Origin Xbox CEO Reshaping Microsoft With “Clarity Is Kindness”

CBI registers FIR after Bombay High Court order

The CBI registered the FIR after recording a fresh statement from Satish Salian at its Bandra-Kurla Complex office in Mumbai.

The development follows the Bombay High Court’s September 2 order directing a fresh probe into the circumstances surrounding Disha Salian’s death. The court had questioned aspects of the earlier investigation and asked the CBI to examine the allegations through a proper criminal investigation.

The court also made it clear that the fresh probe should not be interpreted as a finding that rape or murder had definitely taken place. Instead, the purpose of the investigation is to determine whether the allegations and available material disclose any criminal offence.

What happened to Disha Salian in 2020?

Disha Salian, who had worked as a celebrity manager and had professional links with actor Sushant Singh Rajput, died in Mumbai in June 2020.

She fell from the 12th floor of a residential building in the Malad area during the early hours of June 9, 2020. Mumbai Police initially registered an Accidental Death Report while investigating the circumstances.

The earlier investigation concluded that there was no evidence of foul play and treated the death as a suicide. A Maharashtra government-appointed Special Investigation Team also examined the matter and reportedly did not find evidence of foul play.

Disha’s father later disputed the earlier conclusion and approached the Bombay High Court seeking a fresh investigation.

What allegations are being examined by the CBI?

The fresh complaint raises serious allegations regarding the circumstances surrounding Disha Salian’s death.

These include allegations of:

• Gang rape and murder
• Criminal conspiracy
• Destruction or suppression of evidence
• Fabrication of official records
• Alleged misuse of police machinery
• An alleged effort to create or promote a false suicide narrative
• Possible tampering with evidence and records

These are allegations made in the complaint and are now subject to investigation. They should not be treated as established facts unless supported by evidence and ultimately determined through the legal process.

Why is Aaditya Thackeray’s name being discussed?

Aaditya Thackeray has become one of the most discussed names following the registration of the FIR because Disha Salian’s father had sought an investigation into the alleged role of several individuals, including Thackeray.

The complaint also referred to former Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray and several other politicians, actors and police officials.

The allegations, however, remain allegations at this stage. The CBI’s investigation is expected to establish whether there is any material evidence supporting the claims made in the complaint.

Aaditya Thackeray has previously denied the allegations and maintained that the case was being used to target him politically.

What does the FIR say about the alleged cover-up?

The FIR reportedly contains allegations that certain public servants and police officials may have suppressed case documents, manipulated official records or misused government resources to protect individuals allegedly involved in the matter.

The complaint also raises questions about the handling of evidence connected with the initial investigation.

One issue highlighted is Disha Salian’s mobile phone and the circumstances surrounding its seizure and subsequent activity. The FIR refers to what it describes as contradictions in the records and allegations that data may have been accessed, deleted or compromised.

The CBI will now have to independently examine these claims and determine whether the evidence supports them.

Questions surrounding Disha Salian’s phone

The handling of Disha’s mobile phone has emerged as one of the issues in the fresh investigation.

According to the allegations recorded in the FIR, the phone was reportedly taken into police possession shortly after her death. Questions were later raised about reports concerning activity on the device and how the seizure was documented.

The complaint alleges that the phone’s data could have been accessed to identify people who communicated with Disha and that evidence may subsequently have been deleted or altered.

These claims have not been established by the fresh investigation yet. The CBI will need to examine digital records, seizure documents, forensic material and witness statements to determine what actually happened.

Sooraj Pancholi denies connection with Disha Salian case

Actor Sooraj Pancholi has also responded to the renewed attention surrounding the case after his name was mentioned in reports.

Pancholi has strongly denied ever meeting Disha Salian or Aaditya Thackeray. He said that his name has repeatedly been linked to the controversy despite, according to him, there being no evidence connecting him to the matter.

He also said that his statement had previously been recorded by investigating agencies and that he remains willing to cooperate with the CBI if required.

Pancholi urged people to distinguish between media reports, social media discussions and facts established through evidence.

Also Read- CAT 2026 Registration Last Date Today: Check Application Steps, Fees, Eligibility & Direct Link

What did the Bombay High Court say?

The Bombay High Court’s order is an important part of the latest development.

The court directed the CBI to register an FIR and conduct a fresh investigation into the allegations raised by Disha Salian’s father. At the same time, the court made an important distinction between ordering an investigation and declaring that the allegations were proved.

The court indicated that no individual should be treated as an accused unless the investigating officer finds sufficient grounds to raise reasonable suspicion based on the material collected during the investigation.

The court also indicated that if the investigation does not reveal criminality, the CBI should submit an appropriate report before the competent court.

Connection with Sushant Singh Rajput case

Disha Salian had worked as a celebrity manager and had professional associations with Sushant Singh Rajput.

Rajput died six days after Disha’s death in June 2020. Because of the close timing of the two deaths, speculation about a possible connection between the cases has continued for years.

However, the CBI had separately investigated Rajput’s death and in 2025 closed that case after concluding that it found no evidence of foul play.

The fresh CBI investigation into Disha Salian’s death is therefore a separate proceeding and will have to be assessed on its own evidence.

What happens next in the Disha Salian case?

The registration of the FIR is only the beginning of the fresh investigation.

The CBI may examine witnesses, police records, forensic evidence, digital data, CCTV footage, call records and other material relevant to the allegations. The agency will also have to assess the claims made against individuals whose names appear in the complaint.

For Aaditya Thackeray, the key point is that his name appearing in the FIR does not by itself establish criminal involvement. The investigation will determine whether there is sufficient evidence to take the matter further.

For now, the Disha Salian case remains under investigation, and the final findings of the CBI will be crucial in determining what happened and whether any criminal wrongdoing can be established.

Pulse by Anubhav will continue to track the latest developments in the Aaditya Thackeray and Disha Salian case as the investigation progresses.

FAQs About Disha Salian Case